Blog
This Is How Avoidants Possess You Physically And Mentally And You Never Even Notice | Mel RobbinsThis Is How Avoidants Possess You Physically And Mentally And You Never Even Notice | Mel Robbins">

This Is How Avoidants Possess You Physically And Mentally And You Never Even Notice | Mel Robbins

Irina Zhuravleva
par 
Irina Zhuravleva, 
 Soulmatcher
14 minutes lire
Blog
novembre 05, 2025

They didn’t capture you with grand vows; they held you captive with their absence. Not by what they offered, but by what they refused to give. This is one of the most subtle, almost invisible forms of psychological possession: not by touch or constant presence, but by deliberate emotional deprivation. Avoidant people don’t always wound you with betrayal — sometimes they bind you by withholding. They dole out warmth like rations, enough to keep your heart from dying but never enough for it to thrive. They give you drops instead of rivers, flashes instead of meaning. You start to crave not genuine love but the illusion of it. That isn’t love; it’s a survival mode that convinces you if you quiet down, ask for less, become smaller, they might stay. So you abandon yourself to cling to someone who was never truly holding you. They pull away and then draw near, disappear and then send a message. That unpredictability is intermittent reinforcement: it doesn’t build love, it trains an addiction. You become hooked not on them as a person but on the chase — on the hope that the next appearance will finally be permanent. You change shape. You hush your needs. You mistake pain for passion, anxiety for attraction, and do all of it in exchange for a sliver of attention from someone who has already emotionally checked out. You were enough from the start; you didn’t owe anyone the work of earning their presence. You didn’t need to beg to be seen. The conditional nature of what you received wasn’t because you were too much — it was because they were terrified of what real love demands. Their nervous system couldn’t tolerate closeness, so they punished intimacy with silence, coldness, and leaving the door ajar just long enough to keep you hoping. The ache in your chest now is not love; it’s withdrawal: your body missing the highs and lows it was trained to need. But here is the truth you must carry forward: you were never hard to love — you were attempting to be loved by someone who didn’t know how to remain soft. You don’t have to earn love, chase crumbs, or go hungry to feel wanted. You need nourishment, steadiness, and safety — none of which will come from someone who only offers love in fragments. You deserve a love that nurtures rather than starves you into loyalty. They’re gone. No farewell, no explanation, only silence. Yet they still populate your thoughts — that’s the strange power of absence. When an avoidant exits, they don’t simply end the relationship; they leave an empty place in your nervous system, a vacancy where connection used to live. Their silence echoes louder than any words they once spoke. The absence becomes a presence; you hear their laugh where it never was, sense them in moments they never occupied, because confusion doesn’t let the mind rest — it obsesses. They didn’t slam the door; they faded away, and that whispering disappearance is what haunts you. There was no closure, no concluding sentence — only a slow dimming into nothing — and you fill that silence with the worst of imaginings. An avoidant haunts you not by what they did, but by what they might have been: all the almosts, the maybes, the could-have-beens. They never gave you enough to recover, but always just enough to keep you hoping. Hope becomes the chain, since you’re waiting not for the person who left but for the version of them you once glimpsed — that brief softness that vanished into cold. Piece by piece, you begin to lose yourself: in the unanswered questions, in the conversations endlessly replayed, in nights so silent they feel like punishment for wanting too much. Avoidants don’t say goodbye; they let absence sever ties, because presence is vulnerability to them and absence equals control. But their silence is not a mirror of your worth, and their leaving is not your failing. Their lingering in your mind does not mean you’re still connected; it means you haven’t released the story you built around them. You are not haunted by them — you are haunted by your hope: the belief they’ll return, that silence means thought rather than forgetting, that they’ll miss you when the noise fades. Avoidants do not reflect on what they lost; they replace it. They don’t mourn the connection so much as they escape it. This is where you end the haunting: stop filling silence with their name; stop imagining their return as your cure. Your healing was never theirs to complete. They left the room — don’t let them take up residence in your mind. They didn’t only leave you; they rewrote you and the story you shared. When the truth weighs too much, they edit reality to survive their own mirror. You recall the tenderness, the attempts, the small soft moments; they recall the fights, the flaws, the narrative that you were “too much” or “misaligned.” They minimize magic and magnify mess not because that’s all that happened but because it soothes their conscience. Avoidants don’t simply walk away; they sever the narrative. If the relationship mattered, their exit would demand accountability, and accountability feels like exposure. So they recast your love into a lesson — on you. Suddenly you are controlling, too emotional, the storm to their tenuous calm. You become the reason they had to flee, even when all you did was love honestly. This is more than distance — it’s distortion. They rewrite timelines, reframe the bond, erase vulnerability because it reflects a version of themselves they are trying to escape. It’s not about truth; it’s about comfort. To preserve their autonomy, they brand you as unstable. To protect their detachment, they reduce the relationship to dysfunction, so leaving becomes self-care rather than abandonment. But they cannot erase what you were: you were there for the soft parts, you witnessed the in-betweens, you held space for their cracks even when they pretended those moments never happened. Now your memory is a threat because it contradicts their convenient fiction — and fiction is safer than facing themselves. You may ask whether any of it was genuine. Their words may deny it, but your heart keeps the truth. If someone must distort you to justify their departure, that is escape, not love. They label it “toxic” so they never admit they feared intimacy. They say you were overwhelming because receiving the depth of your love was too much for someone untrained to accept it. You weren’t too much — you were too present, too real; you held up a mirror they weren’t ready to face. So they shattered it and told others it cut them. What do you do when someone rewrites the past to erase their role in your pain? Stop arguing with the caricature of you they created to protect their ego. Stop defending memories to people who’ve already decided they must forget. Let them forget. But never forget who you were: the person who stayed, showed up, loved fully — that is the authentic story, and no one may erase it. Truth doesn’t need rewriting; it needs remembering. They didn’t only break your heart — they fractured your reflection. When an avoidant can’t sustain love, they morph your identity until you doubt who you once were. It didn’t begin with loud silence but with tiny edits: a flinch when you asked for more, a sigh at your needs, a pause at your vulnerability. You adjusted. You lowered your volume, trimmed your desires, muted your joy — not because you wanted to, but because they couldn’t hold your full weight. Thus you became palatable, safe, digestible. They never explicitly demanded change; their withdrawal trained you, their discomfort instructed you, their disconnection disciplined you. Now you monitor every word, second-guess every instinct, having internalized their limits as personal flaws. That is what possession can look like: not bodily control but ownership of your calibration. They didn’t tell you to vanish — you vanished to keep them near. That’s not partnership; it’s erosion of self. Even in their absence you behave as if they’re watching: filtering your voice through imagined disapproval, shrinking when someone shows interest for fear your fullness will push them away too. That’s how they remain — not through continued contact but through the fragments of yourself you surrendered for their comfort. Avoidants don’t only avoid you; they train you to avoid yourself — your passions, your voice, your standards — until you forget who you were before they could not hold you. This is not love; it’s emotional colonization: their fear planted in your confidence, their shame nestled in your boldness, their discomfort lodged inside your joy, and now you carry their wounds as if they were your reflection. But you are not their fear, nor their silence, nor the diminished self you became to feel safe beside someone who never truly saw you. You are still there, buried beneath those edits, waiting to breathe freely again. The moment you recognize that, the spell breaks and their hold loosens, because possession needs your permission. Survival once demanded you shrink; healing asks you to expand. So reclaim your voice, your joy, your identity. The love that required your disappearance was never love — it was fear in a costume called connection. You don’t belong to that fear; you belong to yourself. You don’t have to be small to be loved; you only need someone who chooses to stay. There were nights when you felt near them yet something always felt distant. You gave your body, confessed fears, exposed your soul — and when it was their turn to be present, they dissolved into shadow. This is the paradox of intimacy without presence: the illusion of closeness with someone who never truly arrived. They could be beside you physically yet be emotionally absent, like a body unmoored from its heart. They said they cared, held your hand, touched you — but when you needed eye contact, responsibility, emotional honesty, they receded. Presence isn’t proximity; it’s availability, and avoidants have mastered offering one without the other. You fell for a silhouette that mirrored your desire but never returned it. You heard an echo of your love without its embodiment. In that echo chamber you mistook reflection for reciprocation: you reached, filled silence, carried emotion while they treated intimacy as performance and you as the lone actor. They never invited you in; they let you close enough to feel warmth but never safe. Worst of all, you believed the warmth to be mutual. You thought the partnership was two-way; in truth, you were the one exposed while they kept their armor on. You told your story and waited for theirs; avoidants rarely reveal — they deflect, retreat, then fault you for wanting to be seen. This is an unspoken heartbreak: the body was present but the soul absent. When you made love to someone only half alive in the moment, you felt skin but not truth. Each knock on that closed door met a smile and a change of subject; each request for connection was met with confusion. You weren’t asking for too much; you asked the wrong person. Someone present in body but absent in soul will always make you feel unreasonable; someone who fears intimacy will shame you for needing it. But know this: you were never too much. You were awake, ready, real — and you owe it to yourself to refuse intimacy that lacks presence. Love without presence is a performance; you deserve something sacred and whole, someone who shows up fully. What continues to haunt you isn’t so much what they did as what they never gave: the words unsaid, the touch withdrawn, the safety withheld. Their absence lives inside you not through what existed but through what was missing. You waited for apologies, explanations, for “I see you,” “I’m sorry,” “You mattered to me” — none of it arrived, and that silence became a prison you still pace. Time alone didn’t heal because what you needed was truth and presence, love that gave as well as took. Avoidants don’t create connections through presence; they create possession through absence. Here’s the cruel twist nobody readies you for: you are haunted not by the relationship you had but by the one you never received — the blueprint that never became a house. They left you a draft of a life with missing bricks, and you feel responsible for a home they chose not to build. You replay conversations that never occurred and grieve moments that were never offered. You feel abandoned by something that wasn’t even fully real, yet you lost yourself in it. That is perhaps the most painful possession: being tethered to potential someone refused to fulfill. They gave you no closure, no clarity, no compassion, yet left just enough to keep you open, to make you doubt. What if you had tried harder? What if you had needed less? What if they return? But the truth is the things withheld were never yours to earn — they were theirs to give, and they chose not to. That doesn’t mark you unworthy; it marks them unavailable. You’ve been saving space for someone who never intended to show up, writing chapters alone while hoping they’d supply the ending. Their silence was the ending; you simply refused that ending. So how do you respond when someone possesses you by what they never offered? Give it to yourself. Speak the words they withheld. Become the safety they refused. Close the chapter they left open. Healing isn’t erasure — it’s the cessation of waiting for what will never come. They may have left an empty room, but you no longer have to keep it reserved. You don’t owe your life to the ghosts of unmet needs. You don’t have to be occupied by what was never yours to carry. Free yourself from that hunger and feed yourself with truth. You’re not broken because they didn’t give; you are whole because you stopped waiting. You loved them deeply, showed up, forgave, tried — and still they didn’t stay, not truly or fully. What remains is not only grief but a haunting: a cavern echoing all they failed to become. They possessed you with silence, with withholding, by leaving without a name for their exit. You stayed behind holding the weight of an unfinished story that was nevertheless yours to bear. You kept the blueprint, kept the hope; you became the steward of potential, the archivist of what could have been. You turned their distance into your reflection and, mistaking it for love, tried to revive someone who chose disappearance. This is your turning point. They may have ghosted the relationship, but you were the one who lingered among the bones, explaining, hoping, wondering. Ask yourself what you lost carrying what they never claimed: time, voice, pieces of identity, all spent trying to be chosen by someone who dreaded their own reflection in your love. Enough. This is where it ends — not with bitterness or revenge, but with reclamation. You were never too much; you were too honest, too vivid, too real for someone merely visiting their life instead of inhabiting it. They fled, and you stay — you return home to yourself. You’re not the unfinished paragraph; you are now the author who writes the rest. Build your life without the ghost of their confusion hovering over your joy. Love again fully and fiercely with someone who chooses you every time, not merely when convenient or safe. Reclaim what they never recognized: the laughter you muted, the boundaries you erased, the dreams you delayed while waiting. They’re not coming back — and if they did, they wouldn’t be returning to the person you are becoming. That earlier self who begged to be chosen is gone. This is your return, your resurrection, your reclamation of you. You are not the one left behind; you are the one who walked out of the ruins and raised a cathedral from the ashes. Do not go back. Do not look back. Do not reach back. They never gave you their soul, but you still have yours — and now you get to keep it. You were never theirs to abandon; you have always been yours to reclaim.

They didn't capture you with grand vows; they held you captive with their absence. Not by what they offered, but by what they refused to give. This is one of the most subtle, almost invisible forms of psychological possession: not by touch or constant presence, but by deliberate emotional deprivation. Avoidant people don't always wound you with betrayal — sometimes they bind you by withholding. They dole out warmth like rations, enough to keep your heart from dying but never enough for it to thrive. They give you drops instead of rivers, flashes instead of meaning. You start to crave not genuine love but the illusion of it. That isn't love; it's a survival mode that convinces you if you quiet down, ask for less, become smaller, they might stay. So you abandon yourself to cling to someone who was never truly holding you. They pull away and then draw near, disappear and then send a message. That unpredictability is intermittent reinforcement: it doesn't build love, it trains an addiction. You become hooked not on them as a person but on the chase — on the hope that the next appearance will finally be permanent. You change shape. You hush your needs. You mistake pain for passion, anxiety for attraction, and do all of it in exchange for a sliver of attention from someone who has already emotionally checked out. You were enough from the start; you didn't owe anyone the work of earning their presence. You didn't need to beg to be seen. The conditional nature of what you received wasn't because you were too much — it was because they were terrified of what real love demands. Their nervous system couldn't tolerate closeness, so they punished intimacy with silence, coldness, and leaving the door ajar just long enough to keep you hoping. The ache in your chest now is not love; it's withdrawal: your body missing the highs and lows it was trained to need. But here is the truth you must carry forward: you were never hard to love — you were attempting to be loved by someone who didn't know how to remain soft. You don't have to earn love, chase crumbs, or go hungry to feel wanted. You need nourishment, steadiness, and safety — none of which will come from someone who only offers love in fragments. You deserve a love that nurtures rather than starves you into loyalty. They're gone. No farewell, no explanation, only silence. Yet they still populate your thoughts — that's the strange power of absence. When an avoidant exits, they don't simply end the relationship; they leave an empty place in your nervous system, a vacancy where connection used to live. Their silence echoes louder than any words they once spoke. The absence becomes a presence; you hear their laugh where it never was, sense them in moments they never occupied, because confusion doesn't let the mind rest — it obsesses. They didn't slam the door; they faded away, and that whispering disappearance is what haunts you. There was no closure, no concluding sentence — only a slow dimming into nothing — and you fill that silence with the worst of imaginings. An avoidant haunts you not by what they did, but by what they might have been: all the almosts, the maybes, the could-have-beens. They never gave you enough to recover, but always just enough to keep you hoping. Hope becomes the chain, since you're waiting not for the person who left but for the version of them you once glimpsed — that brief softness that vanished into cold. Piece by piece, you begin to lose yourself: in the unanswered questions, in the conversations endlessly replayed, in nights so silent they feel like punishment for wanting too much. Avoidants don't say goodbye; they let absence sever ties, because presence is vulnerability to them and absence equals control. But their silence is not a mirror of your worth, and their leaving is not your failing. Their lingering in your mind does not mean you're still connected; it means you haven't released the story you built around them. You are not haunted by them — you are haunted by your hope: the belief they'll return, that silence means thought rather than forgetting, that they'll miss you when the noise fades. Avoidants do not reflect on what they lost; they replace it. They don't mourn the connection so much as they escape it. This is where you end the haunting: stop filling silence with their name; stop imagining their return as your cure. Your healing was never theirs to complete. They left the room — don't let them take up residence in your mind. They didn't only leave you; they rewrote you and the story you shared. When the truth weighs too much, they edit reality to survive their own mirror. You recall the tenderness, the attempts, the small soft moments; they recall the fights, the flaws, the narrative that you were

Qu'en pensez-vous ?