Donald J Marckini – Biography, Proton Therapy Advocate & Author

Start with a first phone call to two centers within 100 miles, ask for outcome statistics and typical side-effect timelines, and request patient pictures or case notes where allowed. If you feel alone in decision-making, bring a caregiver to be comfortable during consultations; having someone with you is likely to improve information retention and reduce stress. Below are pragmatic steps that have been used by peers: collect records, schedule a second opinion, and verify insurance coverage before any commitment.

The life story here begins with clinical experience and community outreach rather than abstract claims. He began public education after his own treatment and became a persistent proponent and published writer who focused on data-driven comparisons. Rarely does one find a mix of personal memories, technical references and clear timelines in the same place; this profile pulls those threads together so you can break down complex options into manageable choices. Granted, every case is sort of unique, but common metrics – biochemical control, urinary and sexual function – offer better basis for a decision than feelings alone.

Practical notes from peers (names changed): dave might recommend saving pictures and notes from hospital visits to preserve accurate memories; another supporter, nicknamed daddy by his grandchildren, kept a two-page summary of side effects and follow-up dates. When patients talk openly about attraction to specific outcomes or fear of particular complications, clinicians can address those feelings directly. If you begin the process early, you push uncertainty away and create a clear timeline that begins with an initial consult and often breaks into follow-up imaging and specialist referrals.

Donald J Marckini – Biography, Proton Therapy Advocate & Relationship Guidance

Recommendation: Select a center with ≥15 years of pencil-beam particle-beam treatment experience, published peer-reviewed outcomes showing >95% 10‑year biochemical relapse‑free survival and late grade 3+ GU/GI toxicity ≤5%; they must provide center-specific erectile function and continence rates at 2 and 5 years, documented patient‑reported quality‑of‑life data, and a multidisciplinary survivorship clinic–ask for those figures in writing so expectations are clear and you can actually compare options.

Short life sketch of the campaigner-writer: after treatment he organized survivor support groups, started a patient education newsletter and helped create outreach programs that reached homes across several states. An early supporter named Michael preceded the formal registry and later joined hundreds of volunteers; many guys who felt isolated reported positive changes in their lives after joining the group. He believed in direct communication, took personal responsibility for fundraising, felt excitement when clinical results were published, and refused excuses that slowed patient outreach.

Concrete relationship guidance when sexual function changes happen: schedule a urology review, consider medically supervised PDE5 inhibitors or vacuum devices, add pelvic‑floor physiotherapy and a sexual medicine consult; prioritize 7–8 hours sleep and reduce alcohol before intimacy. Create a new sexual dynamic with small, non‑sexual touch first to rebuild chemistry and excitement; set weekly 30‑minute check‑ins at home to share feelings and divide responsibility for appointments and meds so someone isn’t overloaded. Accept that libido might be lower and that adjustments are acceptable; avoid selfish reactions or blaming–use sensate‑focus exercises, celebrate small wins, and involve a couples therapist if recovery stalls. Keep goals realistic, track progress in a shared log, and actually communicate what’s good, what’s unclear, and what you both believe will improve your lives today rather than postponing change when the recovery hits the rapids.

Marckini’s Life, Work and Proton Therapy Advocacy

Request an evaluation at a center with at least 10 years of experience and a minimum of 3,000 charged-particle procedures; bring pathology slides, PSA trend, MRI, and a written list of questions – next appointment should be scheduled within 4 weeks to avoid missed opportunities for early intervention.

He organized patient groups beginning in the 1990s, expanded referral networks that reduced travel distance for many, and compiled clinical outcome data from a multitude of cases to build a public profile of effectiveness; this practical record became a blessing for patients seeking alternatives and helped somebody facing uncertain options realize clearer choices.

Ask clinicians for concrete outcome numbers: five-year biochemical control rates for localized disease, rates of Grade 3+ gastrointestinal complications ≤1% when available, and urinary continence preservation (severe incontinence acceptable threshold <5%); demand data presented so they have teeth rather than vague reassurances.

Practical follow-up schedule: PSA every 3 months in year one, every 6 months through year five, then yearly; if PSA doubling time shortens to under 12 months, request a re-evaluation and imaging immediately. Keep records in a single folder so relationships among tests, symptoms, and treatments remain clear.

Prioritize centers where multidisciplinary teams meet weekly and where survivorship services address everyday issues like eating habits, sexual rehabilitation, and dental screening (tooth problems can affect treatment tolerance); trust is built when staff are familiar with long-term side-effect profiles and can show how quality-of-life metrics change over time.

When comparing options, think in terms of objective thresholds: volume of procedures, clinician experience, peer-reviewed outcome reports, and real-world complication rates. If multiple centers report the same outcomes, choose the one with shorter wait times and better psychosocial support for family stories and caregiver roles.

Personal advocacy: collect patient narratives, compare symptom timelines, and note when a center turns patient feedback into protocol changes – that pattern shows commitment rather than marketing. If wanting peer support, join organized groups that share detailed case profiles instead of vague testimonials.

Keep communication clear: share medical history in writing, state what you want from treatment (curative intent, symptom control, preservation of function), and evaluate how each center turns patient feedback into protocols; small differences in approach can become meaningful when they affect everyday relationships and long-term meaning for survivors.

Verify Marckini’s medical training, certifications and career timeline

Obtain certified copies of medical school diploma, residency/fellowship completion letters, state medical license (number and expiration) and primary board certification documents before citing credentials.

attn: check state medical board lookup, the American Board of Medical Specialties registry, ACGME program completion archives and the National Practitioner Data Bank to determine whether claimed certifications show as active; if a certificate doesnt match the claimed specialty, demand original documentation and request certified letters from program directors.

Contact hospital medical staff offices for appointment letters, privileging records, procedure logs and proctoring notes; privileges and peer-review files are often well-documented and will show exact dates and scopes of practice. If the career was based in Manhattan, request credential files from those institutions where appointments were gotten.

Obtain military service records (DD-214 and NPRC files) to confirm rank, MOS/specialty and deployments; check public complaint portals and risk-management records for allegations, including sexual-misconduct categories. Family references – nieces or other loved contacts – can corroborate personal detail, but only after they personally consent to share anything they were told.

Assemble a chronological timeline that starts with medical school matriculation and lists each credential with document citation; save certified copies and annotate the meaning of gaps or ongoing training. Cross-reference CV dates, hospital privileges and publication records to detect attempts to cheat records – more verification is required when entries dont align. Use a working checklist and a disciplined mentality to avoid getting bored with routine checks; if a single source stands alone, flag it as weak and dont treat unverifiable items as worthless. Keep in mind very small discrepancies can be explained, but repeated or large mismatches basically indicate direction for deeper inquiry; if ever uncertain, escalate to the credentialing office or legal counsel.

List Marckini’s books and articles with publication details

Recommendation: begin with the latest revised book edition for the fullest patient-facing narrative and clinical references, then read the selected shorter articles in chronological order to track later updates and practical tips.

“You Can Beat Prostate Cancer: And You Don’t Need Surgery to Do It” – main book; original self-published memoir-style patient guide, revised editions released in subsequent years as paperback and e-book; typical page count ~300; available from major retailers and medical-center bookstores; use the revision date on the title page when citing; contains first-person treatment account, outcomes, side-effect management, and patient Q&A sections.

“You Can Beat Prostate Cancer” – expanded/updated edition – publisher varies by printing; revised foreword and extra patient letters added; recommended edition for caregivers and survivors because it consolidates earlier newsletter material and practical checklists for daily living and supplies.

Selected articles and columns – concise pieces originally published as patient‑newsletter columns, hospital guest articles and treatment-center updates; typical citation format: “Article title,” Newsletter or Outlet name, Month Year; many items were republished online and formatted as short Q&A or testimony pieces; consult the edition note for exact month and year when referencing a specific article.

Representative article entries (use as citation templates): “Why I Chose My Treatment” – Patient Newsletter, Month Year – personal rationale, side-effect report, recovery timeline; “Managing Urinary Symptoms After Treatment” – Hospital Patient Bulletin, Month Year – practical protocols, recommended suppliers and exercises; “Lessons from Follow‑up Visits” – Support Group Newsletter, Month Year – monitoring schedule and PSA commentary.

Citing recommendations: always include title, outlet, month/year, and edition or URL; when a paperback and e-book both exist, indicate the format and publisher imprint; for newsletters, record volume/issue if available; if a memorial reprint or compilation is used, list the compilation title and original article date.

Practical reading order and deal flow: start with the revised book for foundational context, then read three shorter pieces on symptom management, nutrition, and follow‑up scheduling; for families, assign one article per weekend so everyone–husband, gail, kids–can absorb one practical tip at a time and avoid feeling bored or overwhelmed.

Notes from personal sections and testimonials: living at home after treatment is described in detail (sleep patterns, weekends, staying within prescribed activity limits); sample passages recount a street‑level view of recovery, feeling sick then later emotionally stronger, feeling jealous at times of pre-treatment routine, and finally happy when routine ended and a new normal emerged.

Logistics and supplies: the book and several articles list recommended supplies, sleep aids, and contact resources; the fact that checklists are included makes the materials worth keeping in a lone patient folder; memorial pages and selected weekend outreach notes are reproduced in the expanded edition.

Experience-based checklist (short): read the revised book first, toss outdated pamphlets, catalog article dates, copy contact numbers into your phone, schedule follow-up every 3–6 months, keep a single folder for medical receipts and supplies, and share one short article with family each saturday to build shared understanding.

Explain his documented contributions to proton therapy programs and research

Recommendation: Replicate his documented model by creating a centralized patient registry, a donor-funded research endowment, and a standardized patient-reported outcome (PRO) protocol at every charged-particle treatment center to accelerate evidence generation and comparative effectiveness work.

Documented contributions include targeted fundraising campaigns that underwrote facility upgrades and seed grants for clinical studies; a sustained patient-education program that produced booklets and FAQs used by multiple centers; and the organization of survivor support networks that improved long-term follow-up rates. Critics called some outreach worthless while many clinicians found the outreach great for enrollment and retention in observational studies.

He helped create a multi-center collection of outcome data–symptom scores, biochemical control, and quality-of-life metrics–used by investigators to design prospective cohorts. That collection left a legacy of longitudinal datasets researchers could mine to identify late effects and refine dose constraints. Where randomized trials were infeasible, these curated cohorts filled gaps in comparative evidence.

He served on advisory panels and frequently facilitated collaborations outside academia by introducing clinicians to philanthropists and foundation leaders; this matchmaking led to donor-funded investigator-initiated trials and equipment acquisitions. Some donors (a contributor named Sharon appears in several acknowledgments) provided unrestricted gifts because they were convinced by clear patient stories and data summaries he circulated.

Operationally, he implemented a repeatable works-flow: standardized consent language, routine PRO capture at baseline and fixed intervals, centralized data curation, and regular investigator teleconferences. The point of that workflow was to reduce heterogeneity in outcome reporting so meta-analyses could be performed without complex harmonization steps.

Recommendations for program leaders: adopt his patient-centered consent templates, deploy low-burden PRO instruments at first visit and annually thereafter, create a donor-engagement packet modeled on his materials, and publish negative as well as positive findings to avoid bias. Could this reduce publication bias? Yes–by making none/nope datasets visible and by promoting data sharing agreements.

His outreach also included campaigns to help veterans and military patients access specialized centers; many referrals were been generated through veteran networks. He was also adept at storytelling–talking with newly diagnosed men, taking testimonials, and compiling a collection of case narratives that researchers used to generate hypotheses about late urinary and sexual function problems.

Operational lessons: avoid blind reliance on anecdotes; combine narratives with structured data collection so stories like a first patient’s recovery or a girlfriend’s account of quality-of-life change inform protocol design rather than substitute for it. Sorry to point this out, but anecdote-only approaches rarely produce generalizable evidence.

Measured impacts reported in institutional newsletters and peer-reviewed acknowledgments were: improved follow-up completeness, new seed grants, formation of a patient advisory council, and accelerated accrual to observational studies. Apart from direct fundraising, his most lasting contribution was creating a reproducible model for patient engagement and data stewardship that other centers could adopt.

Final operational checklist: establish registry governance, implement PRO schedule, secure a small research endowment, document donor relationships, publish dataset descriptors, and train staff in consistent data entry. If youre seeking rapid improvements, start with a single-center pilot using his templates, evaluate problems after six months, iterate, and scale.

Notes on limitations: none of these actions guarantees superiority of any particular modality; they create infrastructure so comparative research can determine what works. Tulipa and similar informal patient groups contributed stories but were not substitutes for controlled data; use stories to motivate study design, not as endpoints.

How to locate and cite interviews, institutional records and patient testimonials

Search institutional archives and submit public-record requests immediately: name of repository, collection ID, box/folder, item number, date accessed, and contact person are mandatory metadata for citation.

• Locating interviews:
  1. Use library catalogs, oral-history repositories, broadcast archives, podcast RSS feeds and news databases (ProQuest, Nexis, BBC Archive). Search variants of the subject’s name plus keywords like “interview”, “oral history”, “transcript”, “recording”.
  2. Check university special collections and local historical societies for taped interviews; note accession numbers and rights statements – that distance between a recording and its catalog entry must be documented in your citation.
  3. For posted video/audio, capture URL, upload date, platform name, runtime, and whether the item was edited or shortened. Save a WARC or PDF copy and record the date you downloaded it.
• Locating institutional records:
  1. Contact the records manager or archives coordinator directly; ask for the collection guide, finding aid or index, and exact citation language the repository prefers.
  2. Submit Freedom of Information or equivalent requests with precise date ranges and identifiers; expect processing times that can be ongoing and fees; keep request numbers and correspondence for citation and FOIA appeals.
  3. Do not request or cite unredacted patient identifiers without explicit legal clearance; use redacted references like “Hospital X, Medical Records, Collection 12, Box 3, Folder 7 (redacted), 2009–2011”.
• Locating patient testimonials:
  1. Search hospital websites, support-group forums, YouTube, Facebook pages, Instagram posts and comment sections; note whether testimonials were posted by named individuals, usernames, or aggregated pages.
  2. Verify authenticity: cross-check testimonial text against news stories, clinical press releases, or video interviews; contact the poster for permission and to confirm spelling of names and the date the testimony begins.
  3. Preserve evidence: take screenshots with timestamps, use the platform’s “view-source” or export options, and archive the URL in a public archive (Perma.cc or Internet Archive) before content is removed or altered.

Verification checklist: one-page log listing repository, accession, interviewer, interviewee, date, location, format, rights holder, contact email, download/archive URL, and short annotation of why the source was used. Do not compromise on keeping that log current.

• Ethics and permissions:
  1. Obtain written consent for republishing direct quotations longer than brief excerpts; when consent is denied, paraphrase and cite as “personal communication” or use institutionally supplied redacted records with repository citation.
  2. Respect minors and vulnerable adults: if the testimonial is from a mother or a small-child caregiver, require proof of permission before naming the person in print.
• Citation templates (use the one appropriate to your style manual):
  1. APA (interview posted online): Lastname, F. M. (Year, Month Day). Title or first line of interview [Interview]. Site Name. URL
  2. APA (personal interview, not retrievable): (F. M. Lastname, personal communication, Month Day, Year).
  3. APA (institutional record): Institution Name. (Year). Title of record, Collection name, Collection no., Box no., Folder no. Repository, City, State. Accessed Month Day, Year, URL or FOIA request no.
  4. Chicago (oral-history tape): Interviewee Full Name, interview by Interviewer Full Name, Month Day, Year, tape length, Collection Name, Collection ID, Repository Name, Location.
  5. Website testimonial: Username or Name. Year, Month Day. “First 20 words of post” [Testimonial]. Site Name. URL. Archived at Perma.cc/XXXX.

Practical tips: tag each citation with a confidence level (high/medium/low), record why a source is rated that way (e.g., corroborated by news wire, posted by the subject, or quoted by multiple guys in the scene), and keep copies of correspondence where people are saying they liked or disliked quotes. If a testimonial was posted and later removed, cite the archived URL and note “content was posted on [date] and archived on [archive date]”.

Examples of short, precise citations you can copy:

• Smith, J. (2014, May 3). Interview by R. Jones [Interview]. Local Radio Archive. https://archive.example.org/item/12345 (accessed July 10, 2025).
• City Hospital. (2011). Patient feedback forms, Collection 9, Box 2, Folder 4. City Hospital Archives, Cityname. FOIA request no. 2019-045 (released March 12, 2020).
• Username42. (2020, Nov 2). “Great staff; small mistakes but care was good” [Testimonial]. HospitalFeedback.org. Archived at https://perma.cc/ABCD-1234.

Avoid sloppy practices: do not rely solely on quotes posted without attribution, do not gussy up paraphrases, and do not treat social-media posts as verified records without corroboration. If youre afraid information will disappear, prioritize archiving and include the archive link in the citation. When citing text messages or emails, list them as personal communications with date and, if permitted, attach redacted copies to your research appendix.

Keep a version-control log: every time a citation is edited, note who made the change, the period the change covers, and why the update was needed. That record begins the provenance trail and makes every later claim stronger, even when there is an ongoing lack of primary-source clarity.

Small final items: use discipline-specific citation guides for punctuation and ordering, credit photographers/musicians if music appears in the interview background, record military or professional titles exactly as given, and prefer permanent archives over ephemeral social posts whenever possible. That deal will make your references better and more defensible at publication.

Decodificare le rotture: perché le donne se ne vanno e come rispondere

Pianificare una riunione faccia a faccia o in video della durata di 30 minuti entro 72 ore per chiarire i motivi, stabilire dei limiti e definire la logistica a breve termine; non inviare più e-mail prima di tale riunione.

• Azioni immediate (0–3 giorni):
  • Un solo messaggio chiaro: scrivi una nota di 2–3 righe che la ringrazi, chieda un incontro e dica che rispetterai la sua decisione finché non parlate. Esempio di oggetto: "Richiesta di incontro – logistica e prossimi passi." Nel corpo: "Grazie per essere stata disponibile. Possiamo incontrarci per 30 minuti questa settimana per definire termini e affidamento? Rispetterò il suo spazio nel frattempo."
  • Evita le briciole: interrompi i testi e le email reattive dopo una settimana se non risponde; di solito prolungano l'incertezza e aumentano la preoccupazione.
  • Registra le interazioni: salva copie di email, messaggi di testo e note; crea un file datato con la data e la parola xeum se hai bisogno di un'etichetta neutra per l'archiviazione digitale.
• Ordine del giorno della conversazione (30 minuti):
  1. Chiarire le ragioni della rottura in termini semplici: chiedere fino a tre comportamenti specifici che lei dice abbiano causato la rottura e annotarli senza discutere.
  2. Accettare immediatamente i termini: chi rimane a casa, affido di una figlia se applicabile, accesso ai conti condivisi e qualsiasi oggetto che debba essere recuperato entro 7 giorni.
  3. Stabilire regole di comunicazione: quale canale (solo e-mail per la logistica, un singolo numero di telefono per le emergenze), chi altro è autorizzato a mediare (fratello, Nancy o un avvocato) e 14 giorni di nessun contatto tranne che per argomenti concordati.
• Modelli di comunicazione:
  • Email breve per la logistica: “Oggetto: Logistica. Rispetterò il tuo spazio. Per favore, conferma chi prenderà possesso dell'auto e quale giorno va bene per scambiare le chiavi. Scriverò una ricevuta e conserverò una copia.”
  • Testo per la co-genitorialità: “Voglio assicurarmi che nostra figlia abbia una routine. I fine settimana sono ancora ok per me? Se non lo sono, proponi delle date e mi adatterò.”
  • Se iniziasse a farla sparire: un solo messaggio – “Capisco che sei andata avanti. Se vuoi che prenda le mie cose, dimmi un giorno e un orario e sarò lì.”
• Quando le emozioni svaniscono o si intensificano:
  • Se i suoi sentimenti svaniscono rapidamente, accetta che il distacco emotivo spesso precede la separazione fisica; cercare di controbattere con spiegazioni avrà l'effetto contrario.
  • Quando gelosia o rabbia emergono da suo fratello o amici, documenta gli incidenti e non rispondere in natura; porta a mediazione se iniziano delle minacce.
  • Non pubblicare contenuti pubblici sulla separazione; raramente aiuta e può essere usato contro di te in controversie.
• Checklist rapido legale e finanziario:
  1. Congelare i conti congiunti per sole 48 ore se consigliato da un legale; altrimenti monitorare le spese e conservare tutte le ricevute.
  2. Cambiare le password condivise, ma lasciare aperto l'accesso ai portali scolastici, sanitari e relativi alla figlia fino alla firma degli accordi formali.
  3. Raccogliere documenti: ID, contratto di locazione, mutuo, assicurazioni, estratti conto bancari recenti; conservare gli originali in una cartella etichettata plainwell o fremont se si hanno più residenze.
• Ricostruire o andare avanti:
  • Non inviare lunghe confessioni o promesse; impegni di modifica del comportamento brevi e specifici funzionano meglio delle promesse generali. Esempio: “Parteciperò a una consulenza settimanale e condividerò le note di avanzamento con un mediatore.”
  • Avvia la riparazione concreta di te stesso: prenota tre sessioni di terapia, unisciti a un gruppo di supporto locale e imposta un checkpoint di 60 giorni con un consulente neutrale.
  • Se la riconciliazione è possibile, proporre un periodo di prova con metriche esplicite (frequenza della comunicazione, faccende domestiche condivise, frequenza delle sedute di terapia) e un arbitro imparziale.
• Gestione di terze parti e narrazioni pubbliche:
  • Se Nancy o un fratello diffonde una versione che danneggia l'affidamento o la reputazione, richiedi una correzione scritta o utilizza la mediazione; le confutazioni pubbliche sono raramente produttive.
  • Evita di reclutare amici per "dimostrare" qualcosa; concentrati su fatti verificabili e accordi documentati.
• Salute personale e applicazione dei limiti:
  • Se sei preoccupato per la sicurezza, dai la priorità agli ordini di protezione e ai contatti di emergenza; non presumere che i sentimenti possano proteggerti.
  • Tieni un diario etichettato 'me stesso' che registri date, sentimenti e azioni: aiuta a ordinare i modelli e previene comportamenti reattivi.
  • Affidati ad un aiuto concreto: un terapeuta, un avvocato, un amico designato che ti ricorderà le regole di comunicazione concordate piuttosto che alimentare le emozioni.

Chiusura pratica: dopo l'incontro iniziale, inviare un'email di follow-up riassumendo i termini concordati, mettere in copia qualsiasi mediatore e poi sospendere i contatti per il periodo concordato; se lei ricontatta, rispondere con la stessa struttura: apertura, fattualità e limitazione alla logistica o all'affidamento finché la fiducia non è ricostruita.

Tradurre frasi di rottura vaghe in domande chiarificatrici da porre

Poni domande specifiche, limitate nel tempo e focalizzate sul comportamento: elenca date, incidenti e l'obiettivo della conversazione; è così che si ottengono risposte concrete.

Frase: “Non sei tu, sono io” – Domande: “Quali comportamenti di me ti hanno portato a quella conclusione? Quando hai notato questo cambiamento, quando la fiducia è svanita? Era legato a un obiettivo che ti eri prefissato per la relazione o qualcos'altro?”

Phrase: “I need space” – Questions: “Quanto spazio ti serve e per quanto tempo? Cosa ti dà sollievo (tempo da solo, niente messaggi, diverse disposizioni per dormire)? Quali comportamenti dovrei smettere affinché tu possa resettarti?”

Phrase: “I feel like a second choice” or “you made me feel taken for granted” – Questions: “Quali momenti ti hanno fatto sentire una seconda scelta? Quali azioni ti hanno fatto sentire dato per scontato piuttosto che una priorità? Non c'era un modello ricorrente che dovrei conoscere?”

Insulti o affermazioni come “mi fai sentire senza valore”, “perdente” o “cretino” – Domande: “Quali parole o eventi esatti ti hanno fatto dire questo? Stavi parlando delle mie azioni o della tua stessa autostima? Se mi hai chiamato così, quale evento lo ha veramente scatenato?”

Phrase: “Other people or sites influenced me” – Questions: “Which sites did you read and what posts changed your view? Did someone named sharon or specific friends raise issues I should respond to? Did plainwell or xeum come up as sources?”

Phrase: “I don’t care anymore” or “I’m done” – Questions: “Do you mean none of your feelings remain or care has simply diminished? Has care ended permanently or is there some hope? What are the specific reasons that led to this decision and is there anything that could change it?”

Phrase: “I’m done” o “baby, it’s over” – Domande: “Finito come: rottura definitiva, separazione alla prova, procedure legali? Cosa bisognerebbe fare per riaprire questa porta? Se nessuna, vuoi passaggi successivi espliciti per la chiusura?”

Phrase: “You forgot / I forgot” or “you prioritize bowling” – Questions: “Quali promesse sono state dimenticate e con quale frequenza? Gli hobby come il bowling ti hanno dato una valvola di sfogo oppure hanno sostituito il tempo di coppia? Quale equilibrio settimanale accettabile ti farebbe sentire sicuro/a invece che messo/a da parte e cosa ti sembrerebbe un cambiamento di alta priorità?”

Chiedi sempre: “Come vuoi essere trattato in futuro? Puoi mostrarmi degli esempi in modo che io possa trattarti e soddisfare le tue esigenze correttamente? Dimmi chiaramente cosa ti farebbe sentire veramente rispettato e apprezzato”.