Blog
The 24 Character Strengths – Full List, Examples & How to Develop Them

The 24 Character Strengths – Full List, Examples & How to Develop Them

Irina Zhuravleva
by 
Irina Zhuravleva, 
 Soulmatcher
19 minutes read
Blog
13 February, 2026

Identify three character strengths to practice this week and measure each day on a 1–5 scale; after four weeks pick one to deepen with targeted exercises and peer feedback. Do this today to establish a baseline and avoid drifting into vague goals.

Break the 24 strengths into six virtue clusters and convert that structure into a practical plan: assign one cluster per month, log two concrete actions per strength, and shift from passive thinking to deliberate practice. Use simple metrics (frequency, impact, difficulty) so you can compare progress numerically; for example, record how many times per week you act on a strength and rate impact 1–5.

Recognize how traditional virtue labels map to modern tasks: courage maps to risk-taking at work, temperance to impulse control, and transcendence to meaning-making. Apply wise approaches such as perspective and curiosity: schedule one 10‑minute reflection after a challenge, answer three strength-focused questions, and write one micro-action you can repeat. Keep an open feedback loop and prioritize integrity when choosing role models and exercises.

In the workplace run 15‑minute strengths huddles twice weekly; ask each person to name one moment they used a strength and one concrete next step. This connects individual development to measurable outcomes: productivity, retention, and morale. Expect gradual gains – a reasonable target is a 10–20% increase in self-rated flourishing across chosen strengths after 8–12 weeks; if improvement is very small, swap tactics (practice frequency, coach input, or peer accountability). Stay enthusiastic, track numbers, and iterate based on data.

Recognizing and Applying Strengths in Daily Roles

Assign one signature strength to each daily role and run a 14-day trial, tracking three metrics: perceived performance (1–5), positive affect (0–10), and task completion rate (%); keep a 3-minute end-of-day log to record what you tried and what changed.

Map strengths to tasks with specificity: use authenticity for mentoring or feedback conversations, prudence for budget and planning tasks, and activity for front-line or mobile roles. For roles that carry high responsibility, prioritize strengths that reduce errors (prudence, self-regulation) and schedule short micro-checks after every two high-risk actions.

Collect baseline data for 7 days, then implement the 14-day intervention; target at least a 0.5-point improvement on a 5-point satisfaction scale or a 10% rise in completion rate. Add simple health measures–sleep hours and a 0–10 stress rating–to detect strain from role changes and keep total daily work time stable while testing.

When a task becomes challenging, plan deliberate shifts: rotate strengths every 48 hours in the same role and note where performance spikes. biswas-diener research supports testing signature strengths in new contexts; use that idea to encourage individuals to apply a known strength in an unfamiliar task and record engagement changes.

Building character in roles involves repeated, measurable actions: set one 10-minute strength exercise per day, mark completed days green on a calendar, and close the loop each week by noting what was done and what you learn. Use habit stacking (attach the new exercise to an existing ritual) so consistency grows without extra friction.

Create a one-page role sheet that contains three prompts per role: (1) which strength to use, (2) the exact behavior to perform, (3) the metric to track. Share the sheet with a close colleague, ask them to note one moment to thank you for applying the strength, and collect helpful feedback. Link to related articles and short how-to lists for quick reference during trials.

How to spot your top strengths during a typical workday

How to spot your top strengths during a typical workday

Keep a 10-minute end-of-day log: list each task, time spent, energy (1–5), satisfaction (1–5) and one sentence on outcome; do this for two workweeks and tally results – this could reveal patterns you miss in real time.

If you’re looking for quick signals, flag tasks that make you feel enthusiastic, tasks you volunteer for, and tasks that frequently produce measurable results (deliverables, client satisfaction scores, or time saved). However, avoid labeling busyness as strength: record outcome metrics alongside effort.

Use simple thresholds to identify strengths: energy ≥4, satisfaction ≥4, request-for-help count ≥3/week, and objective impact (task outcome improved by ≥10% or deadline met early). Mark activities that meet three or more criteria as candidate strengths.

Collect social and behavioral data: count how often colleagues ask for your advice, how often you end the day feeling fulfilled, and whether accepting new responsibilities increases your willingness to engage. A university study links frequent helping and positive feedback to higher job satisfaction and better health markers, so weigh external praise with your internal scores.

Test decision-making and stress handling: when facing a tight deadline, measure time-to-decision and success rate; if quick choices deliver positive outcomes and the task isnt draining focus, decisiveness is likely a strength. Run a one-week experiment where you accept two unfamiliar tasks and rate how fulfilling each felt.

Create a composite score based on clear factors: energy (30%), satisfaction (30%), frequency (20%), measurable impact (20%). Tasks scoring above 70/100 qualify as strengths. Base role adjustments on these scores and discuss findings with a manager or mentor.

Try three practical approaches during meetings: volunteer to lead a short segment, offer concrete help on a problem, propose a solution and follow through; note which approach makes outcomes better and which leaves you enthusiastic for the next day.

Schedule protection blocks: reserve two 60–90 minute slots weekly for your top three identified strengths. Track performance and happiness for four weeks; this positively impacts productivity and mental health, and helps you build a work routine based on what actually energizes you.

Questions to use in conversations that reveal others’ strengths

Ask three targeted questions in a short conversation to reveal strengths: one about a recent success, one about a preferred role, and one about coping with setbacks – this approach gives you concrete evidence you can act on.

Use these exact prompts: “Tell me about a recent moment when you felt most effective – what did you do?” “What role on a team do you like taking and why?” “When things go wrong, what helps you cope?” Follow with clarifiers like “What did that outcome look like?” and “Who else was involved?” to expose behaviors, resources and values.

Interpret answers on a simple basis: frequency (how often they mention the behavior), energy (how animated they sound), and transferability (does the talent appear across contexts). Research from Peterson shows that recurring behaviors map to stable character strengths; Biswas-Diener documents that short strengths conversations and small interventions provide measurable improvements in wellbeing – use their findings as a practical means to design follow-up questions.

In the workplace and in teams ask situational probes: “Which tasks feel relatively easy for you but produce great outcomes?” “Which role do colleagues assign you?” Those replies reveal task-based talents versus interpersonal strengths and help match individuals to roles where they perform best.

Explore daily routines to surface less visible strengths: “Does a morning practice or meditation help you reset?” and “What single habit helps you cope under pressure?” Only ask one or two routine-focused questions early in the conversation so you respect their time while discovering restorative strategies they use.

Listen for concrete indicators: names of behaviors, time markers, tools, people involved and examples of past outcomes. Different cultures and peoples describe similar strengths with different language, so be aware of phrasing and ask for a short story if descriptions remain vague. Be wise about social desirability; perhaps ask for a challenge they overcame to check authenticity. These steps focus helping them recognize talents and give you actionable insight to recommend tasks, coaching or team roles.

Quick home-based activities to test which strengths energize you

Do a 90-minute at-home strengths sampler: three focused 25-minute activities plus a 15-minute reflection and energy check.

After the sampler, use these reflection prompts for 15 minutes:

  1. Compare before/after energy scores and list which activities increased energy the most.
  2. Note physical sensations (alertness, relaxation) and emotional markers (satisfaction, frustration).
  3. Just pick the top two strengths that felt most energizing and write one sentence about how you could apply each to routine life tasks this week.
  4. If a strength remains energizing across two repeated sessions, schedule a short project that uses it twice more; consider this your practical test basis.

Use a simple log (date, activity, pre/post energy, one-line note) for one week to map patterns; research and a psychologist’s brief interventions both describe repeated use as predictive: strengths that energize on repeated trials tend to produce more meaningful, durable experience. Apply findings to roles at home and in broader communities by increasing activities that involve caring, supporting, and building connections–having clear data helps us choose where to invest time.

Behavioral signs that a strength is underused and how to log them

Log a 30-day behavioral record immediately: every morning note one situation where you held back a strength, rate the avoidance on 0–5 degrees, record the perceived threat, and write one follow-up action to practice that strength before the day ends.

Use precise definitions for each character strength so you can clearly find underuse. Define a core behavior for each strength (for example, for courage: speak up in meetings), set a high and low benchmark, and attach objective signals you will track (pauses, silence, deferral to opposition, or choosing fewer options).

Template fields to log per entry: date, time, context (workplace or personal), short description of situation, which strength you expected to use, what you did instead, avoidance score (0–5 degrees), perceived threat trigger, emotions, people involved, whether authenticity felt high or low, immediate corrective actions, and one improvement task. Include tags for seeing alternatives, whether you chose chastity or restraint (when relevant), and whether you needed to speak but did not.

Build a simple routine: brief morning entry, a midday check if the day contains high-stakes interactions, and an evening 3-minute review that records trends. Use a compact scale so logging stays fast–three fields take under 90 seconds. Weekly, counsel with a peer or coach to compare entries and forge targeted drills for improving weak areas.

Interpret logs from multiple perspectives: look for clusters by context (meetings, family, workplace), by person (same interlocutor triggers avoidance), and by trigger type (criticism, time pressure, moral opposition). Add objective information such as number of times you deferred choices, number of times you did not find options, or how many times you felt your authenticity dropped below midline.

Use thresholds to act: if average avoidance >3 for two consecutive weeks, you must assign daily micro-practices and consult psychologists or professional counsel if avoidance causes functional decline. Track progression in degrees, so a pattern becomes visible and you can measure whether the strength does become more present in real interactions.

Practical logging examples: “2026-01-10, 09:15 meeting (workplace), expected to propose options, instead stayed silent; avoidance 4; threat = fear of criticism; evening action = draft two concise proposals and ask one colleague to role-play; note increased seeing of alternatives tomorrow.” Repeat entries like this to forge reliable changes in behavior and to turn private intention into observable, repeatable practice.

Practical Development Plans for Selected Strengths

Set one specific strength goal, assign measurable actions for 90 days, and record outcomes daily to see progress clearly.

Use simple dashboards: log daily actions in a single spreadsheet, mark goals, date learned insights, and flag obstacles. Review metrics weekly and change one variable at a time (time spent, frequency, or challenge level). Psychologist Christopher Peterson’s taxonomy can guide which strengths pair well together; consider grouping complementary skills (for example, curiosity and perspective) and rotate focus every quarter to deepen competence across a larger set.

For accountability, find a partner for biweekly check-ins, remain realistic about workload, and create specific fallback plans for common setbacks (illness, travel). Practical adjustments through measured practice, targeted reading, and persistence will produce clearer habits and measurable gains in happiness and fulfilling outcomes.

Curiosity: a 4-week micro-challenge with task examples

Set a daily 20-minute curiosity practice: 10 minutes of focused reading on an unfamiliar topic and 10 minutes of question-writing or short field observation to convert surprise into action.

Week 1 – Map interests and start strength-finding: each day log one new fact, one question and one small experiment (5-minute sketch, quick search, or a short call). Track where questions cluster to understand emerging talents and topic clusters; at night thank oneself for one discovery to reinforce the habit.

Week 2 – Expand into a larger micro-project: pick one question from Week 1 and run a 7-day mini-research plan. Assign 3 sessions: two 30-minute reading sessions, one 20-minute synthesis (bullet points + a 90-second audio summary). Use at least one external resource (podcast, article, interview) to cross-check claims and help shape conclusions.

Week 3 – Practice regulating curiosity and mastering depth: schedule three 25-minute focused blocks using a timer; after each block note whether attention drifted and why. Apply a simple regulation rule: when distraction rises above two interruptions per block, shorten the next block and eliminate the highest-friction stimulus. Record whether sustained focus allowed you to understand topics more deeply.

Week 4 – Integrate into routine and move toward application: choose one useful insight from the micro-project and design a practical test that you can perform in one week (a short workshop, a demo, a habit change linked to health or work). Measure one concrete outcome (minutes practiced, number of people reached, or performance metric) and plan a follow-up cadence.

Daily task examples you can copy: morning 5-minute curiosity note (what surprised me), midday 10-minute targeted reading, evening 5-minute question stack (rank three questions by novelty). Rotate topics so they do not all belong to the same domain; this produces larger pattern recognition across areas.

Simple metrics to track progress: count of new questions per week, average uninterrupted focus minutes per session, number of cross-domain links made, and one applied test result. Use a single spreadsheet or a dated notebook as a low-friction resource for these numbers.

Techniques to deepen practice: use the “why x5” sequence to push past surface answers, create a one-paragraph micro-teach to check mastery, and ask a peer for one critical question to challenge assumptions. Regulating emotion matters: when frustration rises, pause for a two-minute breath and reframe the goal as exploration rather than performance.

Behavioral nudges to make curiosity routine: attach the 20-minute practice to an existing habit (after breakfast or before evening wind-down), set a visible timer, and set a weekly reminder to review strengths discovered. They will compound: small, daily moves produce larger shifts in adaptive learning and skill transfer.

Final checklist before repeating the cycle: confirm one unique insight, list two concrete ways that insight can help health, work, or relationships, allocate one resource for next-month follow-up, and write one sentence that thanks oneself for the effort and clarifies the next step.

Gratitude: specific journaling prompts and frequency

Do a five-minute morning gratitude journaling session every weekday: list three specific items and write one sentence explaining how each helped you accomplish something that day.

Daily micro-session (5 minutes): write 3 items; label each as person, opportunity, or skill. Aim to complete this consistently – most people see clearer mood shifts within 2–3 weeks. Keep entries concrete (who, what, how) to build a measurable gratitude profile.

Weekly deep session (20–30 minutes, choose a weekend morning): pick one weekly theme (relationships, work, learning) and write a 300–400 word reflection that names 5 gratitude instances, links each to a concrete outcome, and lists one action you’ll take to amplify that effect next week. This practice supports growth and strength-finding by converting acknowledgment into plans.

Monthly ritual (30–45 minutes): write a gratitude letter to someone you value; if you prefer privacy, write the letter and send it later. University case reports show letters produce larger prosocial shifts than lists alone; treat the monthly letter as your official giving practice to help relationships thrive.

Quarterly review (45–60 minutes): create a strengths map from your entries – tag the strongest recurring sources of gratitude (people, achievements, routines). Use that map to set one measurable goal per quarter that helps you accomplish related outcomes more often.

Prompt When Duration Frequency Actionable metric
Three specific things that helped me accomplish X today Morning 5 min Daily (weekdays) 3 items/day → count weekly total
Who supported me this week and how I’ll thank them Weekend 20–30 min Weekly 1 planned action/week (call, note)
A letter to someone who gave me growth or perspective Any morning 30–45 min Monthly Send or archive 1 letter/month
Quarterly strengths review: which sources are strongest? Quarter start 45–60 min Quarterly 3 priorities for next quarter

Use specific language: mark each entry with tags like “core:person” or “core:skill” so your gratitude profile captures patterns. A wise stance toward setbacks helps: note one small frustration and one thing you’re letting go of; gratitude isnt about ignoring problems, it’s about seeing support alongside them.

If time is limited, do a 60-second micro-entry at noon: name one thing you appreciate and one tiny action you can take in the next hour. Consistently doing micro-entries raises baseline positivity with minimal effort and supports giving attention to small wins.

For teams or groups, invite members to share one weekly gratitude in a brief channel post; rotate who writes a short gratitude letter each month. This creates supporting rituals that help teams thrive and keeps a public record of accomplishments and generosity.

Measure progress: track daily counts, weekly reflections completed, letters sent, and quarterly goals achieved. High adherence (5+ entries/week) correlates with larger reported growth in wellbeing. Keep entries factual, avoid vague praise, and focus on creating repeatable habits that reflect your strongest sources of meaning.

What do you think?