...
Blog
Relationships CAN’T succeed without THISRelationships CAN’T succeed without THIS">

Relationships CAN’T succeed without THIS

Irina Zhuravleva
από 
Irina Zhuravleva, 
 Soulmatcher
6 λεπτά ανάγνωσης
Blog
Νοέμβριος 05, 2025

Okay, let me be direct about something: you are not obligated to attend to your partner’s needs. You don’t have to take on their aches, wishes, preferences, or love language as if it’s a compulsory duty. Don’t let anyone — me included — convince you that prioritizing your partner is mandatory. The only time those considerations become necessary is if, well, you actually want a loving, healthy relationship with someone. If that’s your goal, then yes, those things matter and both people need to participate.

Let’s simplify relationships: most breakups come down to one basic pattern. One person brings up something important — maybe they drop hints, have a conversation, or even shout about it repeatedly — and the other person keeps ignoring it. That’s basically it. Now, sometimes the person who’s been raising the issue isn’t communicating vulnerably; they aren’t calmly stating what they need without criticism. So the first question is: are we being truly vulnerable, naming our feelings and what we need to feel safe, close, and loved? Or are we insulting them — calling them lazy or worse — and then expecting them to suddenly put us first?

I’m not suggesting that kindness is a magic wand that makes someone pay attention, but responding with care is the healthy way to go. If your partner consistently dismisses you, makes fun of you, calls you names, or says they feel attacked when you share your feelings, you can choose to stay with that person — but intimacy, friendship, and trust won’t grow in that atmosphere. At that point, counseling is the logical next step.

And yes, I know what you’re thinking, “Jimmy, they’d never go to counseling with me.” Fine — then you’re back where you started. Once again, you can remain in the relationship, but genuine intimacy and connection require effort from both people; they cannot exist when only one person cares about them. Just wanted to clear that up.

Here are concrete, practical steps to move from frustration to real change:

Here are concrete, practical steps to move from frustration to real change:

If your partner refuses to engage at all, here are next steps:

Practical phrases to borrow:

Finally, protect your own emotional health. Build your support network, keep your boundaries, and decide in advance what you will accept and what you won’t. Working for a better relationship is worth it—but only if both people are at the table. If they’re not, your choice to stay should be a conscious one, not a default borne of habit or fear.

Actionable Steps to Build Trust and Improve Communication

Actionable Steps to Build Trust and Improve Communication

Hold a 15-minute daily check-in at a fixed time, five days a week; limit the agenda to three items, rotate a note-taker, and end each meeting with one concrete action and its owner.

Agree on response standards: non-urgent messages answered within 24 hours, urgent flags within 2 hours, and missed-response apologies sent within one business day; track compliance for four weeks and adjust targets if less than 80% met.

Use a clear feedback script: state the observable behavior, describe the specific impact, and propose one alternative. Example: “When you cancel our plans without notice, I lose time; please give 24-hour notice or suggest an alternative.”

Speak with “I” statements and set a listening rule: listen 60–90 seconds without interrupting, then mirror back 80–90% of the content before responding; if clarity remains low, ask one focused clarifying question.

Set conflict boundaries: pause the conversation after 20 minutes or when voices rise; take a 30-minute breathing break, then reconvene with a single goal (repair, decide, or plan) and a 10-minute recap at the end.

Schedule a monthly vulnerability-sharing exercise: each partner shares one short failure and two lessons learned; limit each story to three minutes and follow with one supportive question to reinforce psychological safety.

Use a feedback ratio of three positive observations to one corrective comment in regular check-ins; deliver corrective feedback within 48 hours, reference a specific behavior, and offer two actionable alternatives.

Create a shared weekly log with three columns–wins, concerns, action steps–and review it for ten minutes every Sunday; if any concern averages below 4 on a 1–5 scale, schedule a 30-minute repair meeting within seven days.

Rotate a communication keeper role weekly to remind the team of agreed norms, record missed commitments, and propose one small experiment (timing, phrasing, or format) to test over the next two weeks.

Measure trust with five statements rated 1–5: I feel heard; I can be honest; my partner follows through; conflicts resolve fairly; I understand decisions. If any average falls below 4, implement a targeted repair plan and retest after 30 days.

Τι πιστεύετε;